From time to time you may come across videos or articles under the heading "What Not to Google". Moreover, if for the sake of curiosity you look at the description, you will see words that are absolutely harmless at first glance. Why such requests can shock even the most calm people? And what will you see if you type "forbidden" words into the search bar?
Be warned - these pictures are really not for the faint of heart. And even more so, they should not be shown to pregnant women, young children and those who are especially suggestible.
Fournier. Attention, you can not google: tin
The French footballer, who also managed to be the coach of Olimpik, also got into the most terrible Google queries. Seriously, Hubert Fournier has nothing to do with shock content.
He was just "lucky" to be the namesake of an outstanding French doctor. He, in turn, back in 1883 described a terrible disease, cases of which are still quite common. We are talking about gangrene of the scrotum, which is rapidly spreading in the body. The consequences, like the course of the disease itself, are simply terrible. As you understand, all this also looks, to put it mildly, not very aesthetically pleasing.
Either diseases are more interesting for people than football successes, or Google just likes to shock its users, but when you search for "Fournier" you will see not footage with Hubert at all.
"Pearl" - are we talking about buttons?
What could be so special about the word "pearl" that you can't google it even out of a very strong sense of curiosity? For many, memories of “the exact same dressing gown, but with mother-of-pearl buttons” may even come up.
Unfortunately, the cult film "The Diamond Arm" has nothing to do with it. And again, it's about the disease. Pearlescent papules are no longer such a dangerous medical case as the gangrene described above. They are not even considered an STD, but rather an aesthetic flaw. But he looks more than creepy!
Why does google give ugly frames in the first place and not tint illustration or stuff? Perhaps it's a rather peculiar sense of humor. Or maybe it's because the joke about the dangerous query "pearl" was circulated on the Internet for a long time some time ago.
Loskut: the horrors of "Google" under a harmless request
Another word that can't be googled even under legitimate pretexts is "patch". Yes, it sounds harmless and evokes thoughts of cutting and sewing. Nevertheless, the Google joker invites us to look at the details of skin grafting on different parts of the body, the process of "growing" the donor tissue, and as a "final chord" - the genitals, which are completely devoid ofleather.
Why shouldn't you google "spiky"?
The word "spiky" is another adjective that can't be Googled. It would seem that such a characteristic can fit anything: children's pyramids, architectural structures, appliances. However, according to the tradition already familiar to us, Google's leadership considers the query as part of another medical term.
Pointed papillomas are not the worst thing in this world. But it is better not to check by "hammering" the word in Google. As you can see, the main part of the "terrible" requests are various diseases, deviations. Which once again proves that one should not be negligent about one's he alth.
Pimply-pimples
Finally, back to the medical topic. You do not understand what the word "pimples" can have to do with it? Of course, there is no such designation among the official terms of doctors. However, restless patients often prefer to share their strange rashes with the whole world, posting photos on websites, forums, online diaries and calling symptoms in completely unprofessional terms.
The Google search engine “happily” indexes all these pictures and offers them in the top of the search results. So don't ask for pictures for the word "pimples" if you're not interested in such detailed details of other people's illnesses.
"Tin" - what lies behind a simple request?
You can rate Google horror stories even by such a simple request as "tin". It seems like this word indicates that the userlooking for absolutely any frame with the image of a sheet of steel. But for the search engine, this is a signal that you can show all the most terrible and disgusting. Generic queries aren't really something to experiment with unless you're in the mood for disease illustrations, dismembered bodies, and the like.
Some people enjoy looking at pictures like this, but you have to admit, it's not normal. For an ordinary person, illustrations for the word "tin" will only cause a spoiled mood or a feeling of oppression.
"Cluster" - a query that should not be entered
Don't you know what the words "cluster holes" and "trypophobia" mean? Never google it! Both terms overlap. More precisely, the latter denotes a phobia in front of just the same cluster holes, their mass accumulations. They look especially disgusting on human skin. "Holes" on plants scare, probably, only the owners of such a strange phobia.
The name of a strange mental disorder was given only 12 years ago, and modern science still has not officially recognized it. However, few people absolutely indifferently look at round holes that resemble either a symptom of a disease or parasites. In ordinary life, cluster holes are found as bubbles in dough or in lotus seeds.
For the sake of curiosity, of course, you can enter this request. But suddenly you become one of the owners of trypophobia?
As practice shows, the call "Never google it!" only provokes and kindles curiosity. WhatWell, it's up to you, but we warned you! Then, finally, it is worth clarifying: all “frightening” requests will be revealed “in all their glory” only in the “images” tab. And be sure to get the kids away from the screen!
