The budget smartphone "Micromax Q380" was met by fans of mobile devices very ambiguously. It is clear that the model belongs to the budget segment and does not pretend to be much, however, those of its qualities that satisfy some users cause negativity in others. Let's try to understand the reviews of the owners: what exactly they liked and did not like about this gadget.
Design
Micromax Q380 turned out to have a very attractive appearance, reviews confirm this. The coating is pleasant to the touch and does not slip, so you do not need to constantly fear that the gadget will fall out of your hands. It was noted that the paint from the frame, imitating a metal frame, peels off over time, in connection with this, the aesthetic side of the "Micromax Q380" suffers.
The battery cannot be changed, and this aspect caused both negative and positive reactions from the public. The fact that the old battery cannot be replaced with a new one revolts many. Other users, on the contrary, believe that in this way the developers managed to achievethinner, making the gadget more comfortable to use.
Although the battery is mounted, the back cover is still detached, as there are slots for all kinds of cards inside. The presence of two SIM cards is always a plus, especially when they have connectors separate from memory cards, which allows you to simultaneously work with two SIM cards at once and increase memory for data storage via a flash drive.
Opinions about the screen
The bright and attractive display of "Micromax Q380" with good viewing angles caused a storm of positive emotions among the owners of the device. Information is perfectly distinguishable even on a bright sunny day, and viewing the image from different angles does not cause any problems. Owners are pleased with the vibrant color palette, which makes viewing pictures or photos on the device a pleasure.
All negative reviews regarding the display are directed mainly towards low resolution, which does not reach 720p, while the competitors of the device from the same budget category are quite capable of delighting their owners with an HD image. This drawback is the most significant in the entire "Micromax Q380". Reviews say that in a static position, the picture looks attractive and clear, but during games or watching videos, pixels begin to appear on the screen, the video is smeared and loses its attractiveness, which makes it completely uninteresting to watch movies on a smartphone or use it as a game console.
Contradictory opinions about hardware
Although the phone "Micromax Q380" has got an advanced platform, many people criticize it, as well as the work of the technical component of the device as a whole. There are frequent freezes, glitches and a long wait when loading: for some users, applications opened for 5 seconds. Rebooting corrected the situation for a while, but then the problem arose again - the smartphone eventually went to the service for repair.
As for the processor, the reviews are divided: four cores alone are enough to solve their problems, while others believe that the phone must work with more resource-intensive software, and such an architecture is completely insufficient. Owners complain that 1 GB of RAM is too little RAM. It is believed that it is the lack of RAM that is the cause of the system's incorrect operation and failures while using multitasking in the Micromax Q380. The reviews of other consumers even refer to the fact that the smartphone belongs to the budget category, and you should not expect any miracles from it in terms of performance.
It is worth noting that the opinions of the owners turned out to be so contradictory due to the different degree of assessment of the device. Those who are satisfied with the filling of the model, apparently, do not need complex applications and advanced games, and a quad-core processor is enough for simple software and the Internet. Critics expected more performance from the gadget with the ability to run resource-intensive programs and games. Their requests requirea smartphone from a more advanced segment.
As for long downloads and interruptions in the system, this problem can be called objective, since almost everyone complained to one degree or another about phone freezes, long opening files and other problems with functioning.
Smartphone "Micromax Q380": camera reviews
The main camera has been recognized as one of the most significant advantages of a smartphone. 8 megapixels with autofocus do an excellent job, allowing you to achieve decent quality pictures for a phone in this segment. Macro shooting works well, making the Image Stabilizer switch easily between far and near objects. It is also worth noting the clarity of photos of text documents: letters and numbers are perfectly readable in the pictures, there is no blurring. Of course, all this applies to shooting in good light or in the daytime. Optics behaves somewhat worse at night and with a lack of light.
Front camera
The selfie camera has only 2 megapixels, so it can not be called high-quality. But the owners are already satisfied with the fact that it is present, and this is not a simple 0.3 MP optics installed for show, but a full-fledged camera that allows you to take a selfie if necessary and use it, for example, as an avatar on social networks.
Video camera
The video camera was also well received, allowing you to receive videos with a resolution of 720p. Multiple usersIt’s embarrassing that the optics shoots only at a frequency of 15 frames / s, and not 30, but still the videos come out quite good. The image is a little slow, but it's fine for viewing on small screens.
Sound
No one had any problems with the sound and conversational speakers: there is a high-quality and loud sound above the average. Trouble begins with the use of a headset. The kit comes with vacuum headphones, but users note that they are of very poor quality and listening to music will require the purchase of a more advanced headset. But even expensive headphones do not allow you to truly enjoy the music player in the Micromax Q380: reviews mention a quiet sound, unacceptable quality and an almost complete lack of bass. There are some playback settings, but they do not really change the picture. In this aspect, the apparatus failed.
Battery
Many people praise the autonomous operation of the device, arguing that even with the active use of the gadget, the charge is enough for a fairly long period of time. Other owners of 2000 mAh are not enough, so they complain about the low battery performance, and if you consider that you can’t change it, then the battery is instantly listed in the minuses.
A large percentage of customers claim that the device takes a very long time to charge: for some, it takes about 3 hours. There were also cases when the gadget did not react at all to the charger, and it had to betake it to service.
Conclusion
So, having considered the Micromax Q380 phone, customer reviews and its cost of about 5,390–6,990 rubles, you can understand that user opinions are ambiguous on most parameters of the device. Some understand that the device is budget and you should not expect much from it, so the screen, battery and technical characteristics are quite worth the money. Others want too much from a gadget of this kind. Naturally, it is not so easy to cram an acceptable camera, a good processor and a lot of memory into such a smartphone at the same time. To please users, for example, with a decent quality camera, which would not be embarrassing to take pictures, developers will have to neglect something else, say, the same audio player. There are, however, some unambiguous advantages and disadvantages, but for the most part everyone has a subjective opinion.
Clear pros and cons
The Micromax Q380 phone has reviews, although different, but still has objective advantages and disadvantages.
Pros - IPS-matrix and screen brightness, the main camera with a large set of functions, HD video recording, compact size, attractive design, good assembly, loud speaker.
Cons - low screen resolution, long battery life, system instability, freezes, long file opening, weak multi-touch, designed for only two touches.
On all other parameters, opinions were divided approximately equally, so here everyone shoulddecide for yourself. Perhaps if the developers lowered the price of the device by at least 1000 rubles or simply added a high resolution, the smartphone received a more cordial welcome from users.
